This workshop aims to explore the position of two actors in the process of forming and identifying customary international law: first, ‘specially-affected states’, as they have been famously termed by the International Court of Justice (ICJ); and, second, international organizations. Both of them play only a modest role in the Draft Conclusions.
Have the Draft Conclusions, in terms of doctrine, theory and practice, properly accounted for specially-affected states and international organizations? Or should the final Conclusions – which are due to be adopted by the ILC later this year – accord them greater prominence?
You are cordially invited to attend the workshop, as well as to join the discussion on these and other, related questions.
Programme
Panel I: Specially-Affected States
- Specially Affected States in CIL Formation: Reflections on Criteria for Generality, Widespreadness, Representativeness, Sienho Yee (Wuhan University)
- Why the Draft Conclusions should not make reference to specially affected States, Tullio Treves (University of Milan)
- All States are equal, but some are more equal than others. Challenging the SAS doctrine, Tom Ruys (University of Ghent)
Moderator: Kevin Jon Heller (University of Amsterdam)
Panel II: International Organizations
- International Organizations in CIL Formation: Reflections on Possible Criteria for Possible Contributions, Sienho Yee (Wuhan University)
- The UN and the use of sanctions and self-defence against non-state actors: Reporting requirements as a channel for custom formation, Larissa van den Herik (University of Leiden)
- International organizations and the formation of custom: mutualization or separate identification? Jean d’Aspremont (University of Manchester / Sciences Po Paris)
Moderator: Catherine Brölmann (University of Amsterdam)
