Contingency in the Course of International Law

14 - 16 June 2018, University of Amsterdam

This workshop will ask a question that is deceptive in its simplicity: How might international law have been otherwise?

We want to question the present state of international law by challenging its pretence to necessity and by better understanding the forces that have shaped it. Put simply with Robert Musil: "If there is a sense of reality, there must also be a sense of possibility.”  The overarching aim will be to expose the contingencies of international law’s development by inquiring into international law’s past. Such inquiries may be of systematic purport – asking, for example, how a different conception of the sources of international law could have emerged. Or they may focus on specific areas of the law, asking questions like whether the idea of state crimes could have taken hold or whether the NIEO could have achieved greater success. International law’s past is almost certainly ripe with possibilities that we have forgotten. The workshop will seek to reveal and remember them.

Keynote speaker

Fleur Johns, UNSW

Fleur Johns works in the areas of public international law and legal theory. Fleur studies patterns of governance on the global plane, employing an interdisciplinary approach that draws on the social sciences and humanities and combines the study of public and private law. 

Closing Address

Samuel Moyn, Yale University

Samuel Moyn's areas of interest in legal scholarship include international law, human rights, the law of war, and legal thought, in both historical and current perspective. In intellectual history, he has worked on a diverse range of subjects, especially twentieth-century European moral and political theory.

Programme

Thursday 14 June

12:00-13:00 Welcome Lunch


13:00-13:30 Introduction, A3.15

André Nollkaemper, Dean, Faculty of Law
Kevin Jon Heller & Ingo Venzke, University of Amsterdam


13:30-15:15 Panel 1 – Necessity, Possibility & Imagination, A3.15

Chair: Janne Nijman, University of Amsterdam

  • Umut Oszu, Carleton University: The Necessity of Contingency
  • Karen Knop, University of Toronto: Utopia Without Apology
  • Gerry Simpson, London School of Economics: gardening, instead
  • Chase Madar, NYU, Gallatin School: The Picaresque Novel of International Law


15:15-15:45 Coffee Break


15:45-17:30

Panel 2.1 – Resources, Trade & Sea, A3.15

Chair: Mohsen Al-Attar, University of Warwick

  • Isabel Feichtner, Julius-Maximilians-Universität: Exploitation Bias
  • Lucas Lixinski, University of New South Wales - Sydney & Mats Ingulstad, Norwegian University of Science and Technology: Permanent Sovereignty
  • Alex Oude Elferink, Netherlands Institute for the Law of the Sea, Utrecht University: UNLCOS & The Deep Sea-Bed
  • Surabhi Ranganathan, University of Cambridge: Law of the Sea

Panel 2.2 – International Criminal Law, A3.01

Chair: Kim Christian Priemel, University of Oslo

  • Mark Drumbl, Washington and Lee University: A World Without Judge Pal's Dissent
  • Nicola Palmer, King's College London: Legal and Individual Contingency in Dissenting Opinion in International Criminal Law
  • Ioannis Kalpouzos, City, University of London: Conceptual history and the recognition of contingency in International Criminal Law
  • Michele Tedeschini, SOAS, University of London: Challenging Unnecessary Paradigms: Legal Contingency as a Factor of Historical Necessity in the Tadic Case


17:45-18:45 Public Lecture A0.01

Fleur Johns, University of New South Wales - Sydney 
On Nonevents
Moderator: Kevin Jon Heller, University of Amsterdam


19:30 Speakers’ Dinner

Sotto, Kadijksplein 4, 1018 AB Amsterdam

Friday 15 June

08:30-09:00 Coffee and Tea with Small Breakfast


09:00-10:30

Panel 3.1 – The State and its Absence, A3.15

Chair: André Nollkaemper, University of Amsterdam

 

  • Hannah Franzki, University of Bremen: Corporate Sovereignty and the Contingency of the Nation State
  • Geoffrey Gordon, Asser Institute: Making time: Contingency and Determination in the Interaction of Time and Law
  • Henry Jones, University of Durham: The Contingency of Borders

Panel 3.2 – Matters of Perspective A3.01

Chair: Karen Knop, University of Toronto

  • Filipe dos Reis, University of Erfurt: Different Disciplines, Different Histories? On the Contingency of theObserver and the Turn(s) to History in International Relations and International Law
  • Edward J Kolla, Georgetown University School of Foreign Service, Qatar: Thinking the French Revolution: Towards an Historical Understanding of Change in International Law
  • Mark Hanna, Queen's University, Belfast: If the School of Salamanca Had Only Been More Sociological

10:30-12:00 Panel 4 – Refugees, Migration & Treaty-Making, A3.15

Chair: Marjoleine Zieck, University of Amsterdam

  • Simon Behrman, Royal Holloway, University of London: What Would Refugee Protection Have Looked Like Without the 1951 Refugee Convention?
  • Bas Schotel, University of Amsterdam: The Sovereignty Clause: Why the Admission of Aliens Under International Law Could Not Have Been Otherwise
  • Christopher Szabla, Cornell University: Decolonization of International Refugee and Migration Law

12:00-13:00 Lunch

13:00-14:30 Panel 5 – Colonialism, A3.15

Chair: Surabhi Ranganathan, University of Cambridge

  • Emma Stone Mackinnon, University of Cambridge, Torture, the Right to Rebel, and Contests over the Geneva Conventions in the Algerian War for Independence
  • Petra Gümplová, Max Weber Kolleg, University of Erfurt, Rights of Conquest, Discovery and Occupation, and Trade: The Colonial Invention of Natural Resource Injustice
  • Genevieve Painter, McGill University, Indigenous Declarations at the League of Nations: Speaking Jurisdiction as Another International Law

14:30-16:00

Panel 6.1 – Decolonization and Economic Orders, A3.15

Chair: Umut Öszu, Carleton University

  • Kevin Crow, University Halle-Wittenberg: Bandung’s Missed Legacies: Alternative Normative Approaches to International Law?
  • Britta Redwood, Yale University/Princeton University; What if Bretton Woods Had been a Success? Contemplating International Law in the Absence of U.S. Financial Hegemony
  • Lys Kulamadayil, The Graduate Institute Geneva; Fairy-Tale International Law

Panel 6.2 – Contingent Courts & Adjudication, A3.01

Chair: Corina Heri, University of Amsterdam (tbc)

  • Aden Knaap, Harvard University: A Court by Another Name: What if the Court of Arbitral Justice Had Been Formed?
  • Daniel Litwin, McGill University: Forgetting the Permanent Court of International Justice
  • Mala Loth, University of Oslo: Europe's Manpower: How the European Court of Justice Could Have Shaped Temporary Work

16:00-16:30 Coffee Break

16:30-18:15

Panel 7.1 – War A3.15

Chair: Kevin Jon Heller, University of Amsterdam

  • Amanda Alexander, Australian Catholic University: Histories of Contingencies in International Humanitarian Law
  • Yaniv Roznai, Radzyner Law School: Anecdotes and the Development of International Law
  • Nicholas Mulder, Columbia University & Boyd van Dijk, King’s College London: Why Did Starvation Not Become the Paradigmatic War Crime in International Law?
  • Timothy William Waters, Indiana University: The Kaiser in the Castle: a Neo-Kakanian Perspective on our Present Predicament

Panel 7.2 – Norm Structures A3.01

Chair: Jacob Katz Cogan, University of Cincinnati

  • Teimuraz Antelava, European University Institute: From Early Codes of the 19th Century to Lagonissi Conference: What International Law on Peremptory Norms Could Have Been
  • Athanasios Chouliaras, Democritus University of Crete: International Crimes of State: Simply an old Idea or Better an Actual Necessity?
  • Anna Delic, Tilburg Law School: Reimagining Private International Law Sans Outbreak of Cholera in Rome (1885)
  • Tom Eijsbouts, University of Amsterdam: What of the EU Treaty if the Berlin Wall Had Not Fallen on 9 November 1989?

Saturday 16 June

09:00-09:30 Coffee and Tea with Small Breakfast

09:30-11:00

Panel 8.1 – Human Rights and Displacement, A3.15

Chair: Yvonne Donders, University of Amsterdam

  • Anna Lukina, Hertford College, University of Oxford:  Who Was Right in the 1948 Debate? Soviet Constitutionalism and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
  • Kathryn McNeilly, Queen’s University Belfast: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and International Human Rights Law's Contingent Utopia
  • Itamar Mann, University of Haifa: Population Exchange

Panel 8.2 – International Investment Law (I), A3.01

Chair: Isabel Feichtner, Julius-Maximilians-Universität

  • Kathryn Greenman, University of Amsterdam/University of Melbourne: The Law of State Responsibility and the Persistence of Investment Protection
  • Silvia Steininger, MPI Heidelberg & Jochen von Bernstorff, University of Tübingen: Who Turned Multinational Corporations into Bearers of Human Rights? On Corporate 'Human' Rights in International Investment Protection
  • NtinaTzouvala, University of Melbourne: Neither an Accident nor a Destiny: Aleatory Materialism and the Battle for the History of International Investment Law

11:00-12:30

Panel 9.1 – International Humanitarian Law, A3.15

Chair: Terry Gill, University of Amsterdam

  • Bianca Maganza, The Graduate Institute Geneva: Historical Contingency in the Adoption of Art. 3 Geneva Conventions
  • Anthony J. Gaughan, Drake University Law School: D-Day, Collateral Damage, and the 1923 Hague Draft Rules of Aerial Warfare
  • Helen Kinsella, University of Wisconsin - Madison: Harm to Ways of Life: the Radical Potential of the Concepts of Superfluous Injury and Unnecessary Suffering in International Humanitarian Law

Panel 9.2 – International Investment Law (II), A3.01

Chair: Stephan Schill, University of Amsterdam

  • Mary Footer, University of Nottingham & Michelle Staggs-Kelsall, University of Nottingham:  Cooperation, Organization and Conduct: Tripartite Contingencies and the Role of Voluntary Instruments in Shaping the Place of the Corporation in International Law
  • Josef Ostřanský, MIDS Geneva: On a Fortuitous Transplant to a Fundamental Principle of Law? A Short History of the Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations and the Political Economy of International Investment Law
  • Saïda El Boudouhi, University of Valenciennes/Hainaut-Cambrésis: The ICJ as a World Court for Foreign Investment Cases: Imagining Another Issue to the Barcelona Traction Case (or Re-writing the Success Story of Diplomatic Protection

12:30-13:30 Lunch

13:30-15:00 Panel 10 – Possibilities of Change A3.15

Chair: Kiki Brölmann, University of Amsterdam

  • Frederic Mégret, McGill University: Freedom of Movement
  • Vidyar Kumar, University of Leicester: Revolutionary Contingency in International Law: People, Places, and Things
  • Justin Desautels-Stein, University of Colorado, Boulder: The Realist and the Visionary: on the Problem of Social Change in the History of International Legal Thought, 1919-2019

15:00-16:00 Closing A1.02

Samuel Moyn, Yale University
Moderated by Marc de Wilde, University of Amsterdam

Participation

Limited space is available for additional attendees. To register, please send an email to acil-fdr@uva.nl.

Participation is free of charge.

Location

  • Roeterseilandcampus - building A

    Nieuwe Achtergracht 166 | 1018 WV Amsterdam
    +31 (0)20 525 5340

    Go to detailpage

Useful tips and freetime suggestions

Published by  ACIL

14 May 2018